Staunton Spectator
Judicial Election
For the Spectator
To the Voters of the 11th Circuit
Proceedings of Convention of Southern Democrats who seceded from Democratic Convention, column 3; proceedings of Charleston convention, column 4; of Congress, column 5. Scattered articles discuss rumors regarding internal politics of Democratic party. Article in column 2 discusses the profitable gold mining in the West.
The Trouble at C[h]arleston
Excerpt:
Full Text of Article
This is said to be a world of troubles, and our Democratic friends have had their full share of them at Charleston. After a career of unparalleled success, the agitation of the slavery question, which, somehow or other, has operated to their advantage heretofore, has at last divided the party, with little prospect at present of a future re- union. We are not disposed to make light of the occurrence. The disruption of a great party, which has boasted of its unity and nationality, upon a sectional issue, is an event of vast importance, and its effects, so far as relates to the perpetuity of the Union, cannot now be predicted.
The Committee on the platform reported to the Convention certain resolutions, as explanatory of the Cincinnati platform. The first resolution denies "that Congress has any power to abolish slavery in the Territories--or that a Territorial Legislature has any power to abolish it--or to forbid the introduction of slaves within a Territory, or the right to destroy or impair the right of property in slaves by any legislation whatever." This much negatively, to which is added the third resolution, which asserts that "it is the duty of the Federal Government to protect when necessary the rights of persons and property on the high seas, in the Territories, or wherever else its constitutional authority extends." A majority of the convention rejected these resolutions, and thereupon a number of Southern delegates retired. The Convention then re-affirmed the Cincinnati platform, without addition or explanation on the subject of slavery, but subsequently adopted the Tennessee resolution, endorsing the Dred Scott decision as "the correct interpretation of the Constitution."
In opposition to the theory contended for by the Southern seceders is the doctrine of Senator Douglas and his Northern friends. This affirms the right of the Territorial Legislature to settle the question of slavery within the bounds of the Territory, and denies that Congress has the power to interfere either for or against the institution.
That a diversity of sentiment on the subject of slavery existed between the Northern and Southern members of the Democratic and all other parties, has been apparent for a long time; and the failure of the attempt at Charleston conclusively proves the impossibility of embracing these different opinions in one platform which shall admit of but one interpretation. Even the Seceders at Charleston are not agreed among themselves. Gov. Winston, of Alabama, protested against the resolutions adopted by their Convention, because they do not contain a demand for a slave code for the Territories; and Senator Bayard, of Delaware, actually seceded from the Seceders.
With such an irreconcilable difference of opinion, the question arises whether there is no way of getting rid of the difficulty, or whether the peace of the country and the Union itself must be sacrificed to abstract theories. The only way we know of is to agree to disagree upon questions of really no practical importance. If let alone, the question of slavery in the Territories will settle itself to the satisfaction of all reasonable and patriotic men in both sections of the Republic.
Military Appointments
Sunday Trains
The Baltimore Convention
Opinions of the Press
The Central Rail Road
For the Spectator
For the Spectator
For the Spectator
For the Spectator
For the Spectator
For the Spectator
Page is mostly advertisements, land sales, etc.; bottom right is illegible.
Married
Died
Died
Advertisements; bottom left is illegible, bottom of whole page is blurry.